Anarchism: Arguments For and Against

Albert Meltzer

Albert had become increasingly concerned about what he saw as the ghettoisation of anarchism. Separated from the working class base so necessary to achieve social revolution, anarchism could easily fall into the twin traps of philosophical radicalism or revolutionary arrogance, the “we’re more militant than anyone else” approach. Both stands have appeared in British anarchism alongside a sometimes demoralising and destructive incestuous approach to revolutionary change. Anarchists talk only to other anarchists and are unable to relate to the vast majority of people who are not of their belief and see anarchism as a rather exotic or illogical idea.

This then was Albert’s attempt to examine arguments people may have about why anarchism can never work and to counter them. He also examines the basic tenets of anarchist thought and practice and in doing so destroys some of the myths that have been created about anarchist theory and action. It’s a book for those of us who try to win people over to our ideas in everyday life and such it is a book that tries to break down the walls of the ghetto that anarchism has become trapped in.

status checked out
genre Anarchism » Anarchist Theory
publisher AK Press
publish date July 1, 2001
popularity checked out 4 time(s)

Reviews

  • By Sam Swicord -

    A very concise overview of criticism of anarchism. Well written.

Leave a Reply